GZG List archives -- August 2006

Number 15 of 248 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Batrep for 28 July 2006



On Tuesday 01 August 2006 14:13, Doug Evans wrote:
> Thanks for the report!
>
> I know that the number crunchers would have preferred turn-by-turn tallies
> of die rolls, still gives a feel for your battle.
>
> Do you know, off hand, whether you used the SSD's that matched your figs? I
> know I can identify some of the ships from your piccies; I assume it's too
> much to hope you kept the battle sheets.

We did not use SSDs that matched the figs.  I think I kept the SSDs though.  
I'll see what I can collect together, maybe scan and email them to you if 
it's complete-ish.

> If I think I can extract enough info, would you object to me putting a
> write up of this up on the test forum?

No objection at all.  Just don't bring attention to the thinned hair my 
noggin'.  D'oh!  I just did.  Dangit.

The group's impression of the grasers, when Patrick and I were down-range of 
them, is that they FEEL like they're too powerful when your ship is 
obliterated very quickly by them, but that they probably aren't given the 
cost and lower incident of hits, etc...  Not sure how the math works out and 
I'm not enough of a math-whiz/number cruncher to figure it for myself. 

-- 
--
Tim (Flak Magnet) G.
Flak Magnet's Miniatures
www.flakmagnet.com
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Batrep for 28 July 2006
  • Next by Date: [GZG] [DS2] Tracked AFVs, APCs, MICVs, etc. in DS 2

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Batrep for 28 July 2006
  • Next by thread: [GZG] Dragon Con

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Sep 04 01:07:33 GMT 2006