GZG List archives -- July 2006

Number 370 of 441 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [GZG] Query: Cinematic vs. vector in FT



That's a good point. I also picked up the notion somewhere that an odd-numbered thrust rating was more useful in vector movement, but can't remember where I got that idea.
 
Best,
Ken

"McCarthy, Tom (xwave)" <Tom.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In our group, one prefers vector, 3 prefer cinematic, and 3 have no preference.
 
Something to keep in mind, is that designs which are balanced in cinematic might not be in vector.  That?s easily corrected for those who design their own.
 
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] And now for something completely different... and maybe even on topic
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Query: Cinematic vs. vector in FT

  • Previous by thread: RE: [GZG] Query: Cinematic vs. vector in FT
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Query: Cinematic vs. vector in FT

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Tue Aug 01 01:07:47 GMT 2006