[GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 15, Issue 9

[Daniel Casquilho <danielc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>From: "Paul Owen" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [GZG] [LST] Yahoo group; official?
>To: <gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Message-ID: <913FF39A3E9C90499099E35B4C42C5453C9C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
>> 
>> ***snippage***
>> > The BB site does look very nice though and also very 
>> official!!  Not 
>> > sure how Jon feels about that part of it and yes I have 
>> cc'ed him on 
>> > this.
>> ***snippage***
>> 
>> Jaime Tiampo wrote on 07/09/2006 10:26:04 PM:
>> 
>> ***snippage***
>> > Perhaps this would be a good time to request some help from 
>> the list.
>> > Quite a few months ago Jon asked me to put together a forum for him.
>> ***snippage***
>> 
>> Did sound like a semi-authorization, but, Jaime?, it wouldn't 
>> hurt to change the GZG graphic to indicate a test system. 
>> Fair enough, Paul?
>> 
>
>Might be a very good idea, as it is it does look like an official GZG
>site which I don't think it really should be, now I do understand it was
>mentioned to Jon in passing but hes a very busy bee at the minute and
>maybe didn't realise the implications of what he was agreeing too, 'what
>ohh hmm yea sounds reasonable, no that box doesn't go on the lorry, hey
>your unloading into the wrong house', as mentioned we have been down
>this road and I think the concensus of oppinion was that it would
>alienate too many people.  
>
>That's not to say you shouldn't do it for those that want it, I think
>you just need to alter the site a bit to make it a little less official
>GZG looking.  And I still think it looks good.
>


I am just curious, do you always speak for Jon?

dafrca
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l