GZG List archives -- July 2006

Number 97 of 441 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)



On 7/7/06, McCarthy, Tom (xwave) <Tom.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In FT, checking systems at the end of a row of hull boxes is a simple mechanism for attrition of systems.

I like attrition. I'm just not crazy about the lack of granularity in the FT system. The ship is perfectly okay up through the point where there is one hull point left on that hull row line... then things fall apart with one damage point suffered.

That having been said, the cure is far worse than the disease from
what I've seen.

Oh, and the Command and Colors games (Memoir 44, Battle Cry, Command &
Colors: Ancients) has an even more severe lack of granularity. An
infantry unit has 4 figures. It is 100% effective until it loses the
last figure, then it disappears. And yet this system is my favourite
board game system. Go figure.

--
Allan Goodall            http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
awgoodall@xxxxxxxxx





  • Prev by Date: RE: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

  • Previous by thread: RE: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)
  • Next by thread: RE: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Tue Aug 01 01:07:46 GMT 2006