Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

[Noam Izenberg <noam.izenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 7, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Allan Goodall wrote:

> On 7/7/06, Noam Izenberg <noam.izenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, Commander, the if ship I'm targeting at 12 mu (roughly 12,000
> > km if we go with the common 1mu = 1000 km unit) were a 200 meter
> > diameter sphere, it takes up 3.44 arcseconds of my sky. Considering
> > it's usually more like an edge-on blade shape maneuvering at several
> > G with a distorting grav gradient behind it, be glad we can hit the
> > thing at all.
>
> And now we're suggesting that those same beams can hit individual
> robotic fighters pulling 25 g at the same range?

I have no problem with that. I think of beams in this context as  
flyswatters of coherent light.
P-torps as buckshot vs. dragonflies.

I understand and accept your dislike of it, though.
>

---

"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously  
considered as a means of communication.  The device is inherently of  
no value to us."
         -- Western Union internal memo, 1876