GZG List archives -- July 2006

Number 67 of 441 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)



On 7/7/06, Noam Izenberg <noam.izenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The most logical PSB comes from the fact that we are simulating a 3D system in 2D. If we force all port fire to only hit port systems we are forcing a highly unrealistic Flatland 2D system.

That doesn't explain why the attacking commander allowed his weapon batteries to fire on the weapons of his opponent's far side when they should have been targeting the closer weapons (i.e. the ones firing back at him).

This is why I generally dislike PSB. I just say, "cause the game plays
easier that way" and I'm done with it.

--
Allan Goodall            http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
awgoodall@xxxxxxxxx





  • Prev by Date: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

  • Previous by thread: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)
  • Next by thread: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Tue Aug 01 01:07:46 GMT 2006