GZG List archives -- July 2006

Number 66 of 441 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)




On Jul 7, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Allan Goodall wrote:

On 7/7/06, Hugh Fisher <laranzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I really like the Full Thrust threshold checks as opposed
to just about every other critical hit system I've ever
seen because they don't occur very often.

I prefer the system in _Silent Death_, myself. It's major failing is that critical hits are very predictable.

I prefer any system damage done outside of thresholds to simply be "leak" damage (i.e. not critical) of a random system here or there.


One thing that bugs me about Full Thrust is the fact that you can be
attacked primarily from one direction and lose the weapons on the
other side of the ship. I know people have PSB to cover it, and I know
there is no easy fix to the problem.

The most logical PSB comes from the fact that we are simulating a 3D system in 2D. If we force all port fire to only hit port systems we are forcing a highly unrealistic Flatland 2D system. Allowing fire from the port to rake across to damage starboard systems (for example) implies the ships can be at slight angles to one another, or "above" and "below" each other in 3-D space.


Noam
-

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."
-- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899








  • Prev by Date: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

  • Previous by thread: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)
  • Next by thread: Re: Critical hits (was Limits on armour?)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Tue Aug 01 01:07:46 GMT 2006