Re: Re: Fighter Fixes was Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

[<laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>From: Robert N Bryett 
>That's one reason why I keep banging on about the evasion mechanism eating away at the CEF of heavy missiles.

How about if HM got a bit more CEF? I agree with you that I'd like HM to be long range weapons, not just channelizing (or as OA  put it "battlefield shaping") weapons.

>you have to invest heavily in PDS <snip> FCS are more versatile than PDS though, so the effect might be less marked.

I think you'll still want to bring some PDS, but you won't need as many as you do now.

Oerjan said:
>> I will almost certainly be able to avoid most or all [missiles]

RBrett said:
>In our admittedly limited experience, that depends a *lot* on the  
>target's thrust rating. 

And the velocity. A Thrust 6 ship poking along at speed 4 isn't as safe as a Thrust 2 ship at speed 24.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l