GZG List archives -- June 2006

Number 203 of 214 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Fighter Fixes was Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update





On 29/06/06, Robert N Bryett <rbryett@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29/06/2006, at 2:16 AM, Oerjan Ariander wrote:

>> It looks very ugly on paper (particularly if you read the "explain
>> everything in triplicate" version you linked to), but it actually
>> plays about as fast as standard FT2.5.

>On the face of it that seems unlikely, but I suppose it >depends what
>one means by "about".


As in exactly the same amount of time. It may look complicated but in practice it is very easy and very satisfying to use. My group has been using these rules since they were first posted on this list and have never looked back.

To reiterate-it does play just as fast, really, I kid ye not.

Cheers,

Matt Tope


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: [GZG] [FT] Point Blank / Passing Fire
  • Next by Date: Re: Fighter Fixes was Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

  • Previous by thread: Re: Fighter Fixes was Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update
  • Next by thread: Re: Fighter Fixes was Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Jul 01 01:07:33 GMT 2006