GZG List archives -- June 2006

Number 134 of 214 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update



John Tailby wrote:

Why would range of engagement with a missile affect it's chance of a hit? I can see situations where missiles have a harder chance locking on up close than they do at a distance. Missile chance to hit would likely be a function of sensor lock from parent ship - ECM with distance a neutral factor.

In reality, you mean? The longer the missile has to fly to reach its target the more time the target's ECM has to break its target lock and/or simply outmanoeuvre the missile; and the farther away the the missile's parent ship is from the target, the greater the time lag on its sensor returns becomes and the less up-to-date the targetting data the parent ship can send to the missile will be. Distance is far from neutral for missile engagements.


What feel do you want with your missiles?
If you use a couple of 20 century models as examples.
If you want the game to feel like 20C naval warfare then your missile speed / engagement envelope needs to be much larger than the speed of the ships. Missiles lauched today are thousands of times faster than the speed of a warship

Er... if you used a little less hyperbole and shaved a zero or two off from that "thousands", your example would probably be more convincing.


A missile "thousands of times faster" than the warship it is targetting would fly at speeds of Mach 50+ (at sea level, since that's where most of today's warships tend to be located). Not even solid anti-tank projectiles can fly that fast without melting within a fraction of a second...

Actual anti-ship missile speeds today are generally in the Mach 0.5 - 3 range; the fastest Russian supersonic ship-killers might go up to Mach 5, but that's *really* extreme.

IOW, typical missiles today fly 10-50 times faster than the ships they are targetting. Still a big difference compared to the anti-air situation where missiles could even be *slower* than their would-be targets on occasion, but the gap to direct-fire weapons is even larger.

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxx

"Life is like a sewer.
 What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: RE: [GZG] re: Sheep con Queso
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] (OT?) X-Treme Hobby...

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Jul 01 01:07:32 GMT 2006