GZG List archives -- June 2006

Number 136 of 214 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update



John L weighs in:
>I think that ECM, Range and PDS should be major factors in how many missiles lock on and how many get through, but it seems to me that if you have homing missiles, you should not have to guess where the enemy is going and drop them onto the table in the hopes that he'll essentially run into their target envelope.

So we'd have direct fire weapons, the defense to which is distance (and perhaps ideally a combination of small cross section and high agility to induce misses); and missiles, the defense to which is point defenses (and ideally ECM, to induce misses). And perhaps mines, the defense to which is avoiding their area.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] (OT?) X-Treme Hobby...
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Jul 01 01:07:32 GMT 2006