GZG List archives -- June 2006

Number 50 of 214 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Revised Missiles (long) was Re: [GZG] Heavy missile questions.



However, I would not want multi-turn missiles as long as they are prohibited
from carrying V from turn to turn; they will simply be left behind in actions
with a higher base V.

In my experience you usually shoot missiles at targets that are closing on you, so the missiles don't normally get left behind. I grant there are some occasions where that isn't the case.


The second thing to consider is the number of EF. Your
suggestion of 6EFx6MU results in a powered envelope of 36MU, 50% larger than
either my proposal or the FB1 SMs.

There are other proposals out there--one of which is for SM to move 18mu x 2 turns.


b) delete the FCS tracking stuff for simplicity's sake.

Thats fine, but I'd want to keep the limit that FCS used for actual launches
are commited to that target for the rest of the turn.

JonT considered that for the original MT missile rules but decided against it for simplicity's sake.


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Revised Missiles (long) was Re: [GZG] Heavy missile questions.
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Heavy missile questions.

  • Previous by thread: Re: Revised Missiles (long) was Re: [GZG] Heavy missile questions.
  • Next by thread: Re: Revised Missiles (long) was Re: [GZG] Heavy missile questions.

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Jul 01 01:07:32 GMT 2006