GZG List archives -- June 2006

Number 12 of 214 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[GZG] Re: FT Beam5 Question



From: Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxx>

>What weapon arcs did your ships have? IIRC all your big beams in that 
>battle were (F)-arc only (Vector movement rules), so in order to keep a 
>chaser under while retrograding you would've had to spend 2 thrust points 
>on rotations each turn to accellerate away from them. If you started on 
>even slightly converging vectors, that would've allowed B3-armed ships with 
>"mere" MD parity to catch up fairly quickly.

They were all F, correct. B3 ships would catch up to total beam parity in a few turns,
the key would be being able to threshold a couple of them first, and then trying to 
control the crossover.

<<winmail.dat>>

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] FT Beam5 Question
  • Next by Date: [GZG] Patrimonium Petrl - Papal High Guard

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] Patrimonium Petrl - Systems, Worlds, & Politics
  • Next by thread: [GZG] RE: [FT]FullSteam [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Jul 01 01:07:32 GMT 2006