GZG List archives -- May 2006

Number 234 of 248 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[GZG] Re: Clean Up the Posts (Was Ping)



>> From: "Don M" <dmaddox1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Point taken..........although considering the lack of content on
>> list this weekend, was it so bad?
>
>No, it wasn't that bad this time... but it happens all the time. The
>only thing in the digest were one line replies, which made them stand
>out.
>
>I guess I was just in a bad mood, and for that I apologize.
>
>Allan

Allan,

Do not feel bad. It is the failure to clean up the replies that often causes me to just give up following a thread. I do not understand why it was a bad thing for you to point it out or to ask for others to clear out the underbrush in their replies. I find it is even worse with the longer posts. Because the Digest is the only way I can participate, it is not unreasonable to ask people to clean up all the extra header and tail info from their replies.

And if that means I am in a bad mood to, well so be it.

dafrca

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] FT - seeking missile salvo miniature ideas
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] FT - seeking missile salvo miniature ideas

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re: [SG] DFFG/1 (Gatling Type)??
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Clean Up the Posts (Was Ping)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Jun 01 01:07:30 GMT 2006