Re: [GZG] Holy Roman Empire - new minor power

["John Brewer" <jbrewer@xxxxxxxxx>]

With the Common Republic acting as a buffer between us and the FSE, the health, wealth, & safety of the Patrimonium Petrl greatly benefits from it's benevolent friendship with the Common Republic.  

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, we bless thee and ask Almighty God for continuing peace & prosperity for our nations & our on-going commercial aspirations.  

Yours in Christ,  
Julius III  
"Pax Astra ad Infinitum"  


-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvester Wrzesinski
Sent: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:29:18 -0700
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [GZG] Holy Roman Empire - new minor power

John Brewer wrote:

>We accept system BD+11.383 as the See of the Patrimonium Petrl, and allow free transit to ships bearing the flag of the Common Republic.  
>
>We also have an interest in system BD-01.565 and also wish to establish an oceanic agricultural mission on the 2nd planet of BD-02.0690 AKA Ikthyos.  And from this, we offer a portion of the agricultural output for export to the Common Republic.  
>  
>
The Common Republic has no claim to this system, and welcomes trade.

>And we also are interested in establishing agricultural missions on New New Detroit & Pivot, and also offer a portion of the output for export to the Common Republic.  
>  
>
Pivot has no agricultural capacity (as it was initially set to be an 
uninhabitiable system, but a central one. It's dissapearance from the 
current map is all the more fitting thusly) and has no planets capable 
of said without much terraforming.

>We humbly ask for free transit through the systems of New New Detroit & Pivot in the form of patrol responsibilities.  In so far as the Patrimonium Petrl can draw resources from predominatly Catholic nations like the LLAR, Confederation of Celtic States, & New Irish Republic, the Papal High Guard boasts of a fleet nearly as large as the FSE, and this would go a considerable way in discouraging the FSE from engaging in incursions that are counter to the interests of the Common Republic & the Petrl as well.  
>  
>
The Common Republic politely refuses such patrol issues, as we are a 
client state of the FSE, and have some considerable yard capacity. Our 
own forces, while not comparable to yours or the FSE's, is more than 
capable of maintaning order in our systems. We provide second and third 
line designs for the FSE navy, and they assisted us when we were in 
conflict with the nascent New Detroit Republic (backstory coming one 
day). We thusly have no need for anti-piracy patrol. We also have used 
the BD+11.383 system as a trans-shipment point for our completed 
products to the FSE. However, we may consider concluding an agreement 
with the separatists to use the Delta Triangulai system. Our actual 
relationship is somewhat strained, as we are the end result of a colony 
mission of nonconformists from the FSE. Still loyal, but loyal in 
opposition. It is... complicated. This being said, we have our own 
political alignment, and we also do not condone FSE adventurism in our 
backyard, much less at potential trading partners.

We are willling to have concurrent naval visits, perhaps of a squadron 
of our ships visiting your ports, and a squadron of yours visiting ours.

See http://members.shaw.ca/victor-daivon/CRfleet.html for fleet 
specifications. At present the Shark and Volcano are in prototype 
stages, but are expected to be in service eventually.

We await your reply...
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l