RE: [GZG]Habitablesolarsystems [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

["Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I have to agree that permanent *sustainable* societies are extremely
unlikely in the timeframe allowed.

For uninhabitable systems, it seems quite reasonable that many systems would
have some sort of "prospecting/refeuling" base to support wildcatters and
S&R (probably a couple of hundred permanent residents).  Many would be
government sponsored (for military refeuling) or simply to discourage pirate
bases.

For extremely poor or marginal systems, these bases may have been abandoned
or sold to private concerns (or even blasted to space dust by the departing
government).


Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/ 

> -----Original Message-----

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l