GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 369 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[GZG] Re: FMARPG [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



>> That's exactly what I'm trying to do.  I want  to use this with Stargate.
>> The
>> advantage of having a consistent path from RPG to Skirmish to Platoon
>> level to DS would be very beneficial.  I think it would be easier to bolt an
>> RPG
>> onto the FMA system than it would be to bolt large scale combat onto an RPG.

I hope this does not offend, but I do not understand the need to tie in FMA to the RPG level play. I have done a d20 to Stargrunt level tie in a few times and had no issues. Now to be fair I, as GM, did fudge a few rolls when I did not want the Characters to die, but that happens in any RPG. I did not feel the need to have the RPG characters somehow match the units Stargrunt rules etc.

Just curious to the thinking here. 

dafrca
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] Re: FMARPG [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 12, Issue 42

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] Re: FMARPG [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: FMARPG [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:31 GMT 2006