GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 335 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Saieed Khalifate




From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Actually I always had it in my mind that things were the other way
around. That the SK got chucked out for not following the nutters. I
guess I had in mind something more in Khalificate of Saladin, learned,
tolerant (excepting Crusading nutters) and just keeping the lid on it's
own ratbags.

One crux of the question, as far as maps and conflicts are concerned is which islamic power (IF or SK), if any, is in primary conflict with NI? If one or the other is, that one probably needs to be "close" to NI - not more than a couple 3 parsec links, or one long link from New Jortan and or Tzfat at least. OR, the Jewish/Islamic conflict of the last century *could* be claimed in Future History to have mostly healed and given birth to something else, in which case, none of the Islamic powers need be near NI, and they can spend their time harassing, and being harassed by the ESU and the Swiss (the most proximate powers to NI on the non-canon map).


-N


---

“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore always carry a small snake.” - W. C. Fields


_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] "mini-campaign" scenarios?
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] "mini-campaign" scenarios?

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Saieed Khalifate
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Saieed Khalifate

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:31 GMT 2006