Re: [GZG] [FT] "mini-campaign" scenarios?

["Roger Books" <roger.books@xxxxxxxxx>]

I definatelly don't want to run this campaign with my FSE DN.  I'd be toasted in short order.

Roger

Out-of-Supply definately hurts the FSE.

On 4/20/06, Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

        Chanting in the rune-encrusted magic circle at midnight,
        I raise this thread from the dead:
        http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200307/msg00082.html

> I was wondering about the feasibility of adapting
> some of the Amarillo Star Fleet Battle scenarios
> to Full Thrust.
>
> I'm thinking specifically about "The Lone Grey Wolf"
> scenario.  A lone dreadnaught, 600 parsecs deep in
> enemy territory, low on fuel, is trying to sneak
> back to safety.
>
> The interesting game mechanic is the forces table.
> A set of six linked games are played, with limited
> repair available in between games.  At the start of
> each game, a roll is made on the table to discover
> which task force the dreadnaught will have to
> escape from.
>
> In addition, if a game lasts more than 20 turns,
> a new roll is made on the table, to reveal which
> new hostile task force turns up.
>
> I suppose each force in the table has a point value
> comparable to a dreadnaught, though I haven't analyzed it
> yet.
>
> Has anybody made something similar for Full Thrust?

        Does anybody have any thoughts about
        the point limitations on each task force
        in order to make a balanced scenario?
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l