Re: Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

[Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey, the whole Free Cal-Tex thing is a bit over the top for me; I'm
definitely not asking for any official extensions. As you say, the man
comes up with enough weirdness on his own. ;->=

As for the official ORC's, given the look of the fighters, I'm considering
calling the capitals 'Fast Base Stars'. However, I'm not suggesting, and
don't think the saintly one is up for, mechano-races just yet.

I like the philosophy of 'filling of gaps is left an exercise for the
reader'. Though I assume this will fall even further with the next
iteration of FT and associated fleet sections/books/suppliments/whatever.

On the other, other hand, when you're pitching, I ain't the one to be
standing in the way. ;->= ^ 2

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 04/14/2006 02:17:28 PM:

> >As the ORC ships are under the Full Thrust section of the catalog,
> >certainly agree the Outrim should be on the canon map, and you
> > could point to any spot and say 'that's the AE', but, as for
> > putting the name on the
> >map... *ahem* *whistle*
>
> Well, we could petition St Jon to recognize the AE as an official
> part of the ORC.  Jon might go for that--he likes weird stuff. ;-)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l