Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

[<laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

You said:
>> >Not to mention licensed, private prospectors and their suppliers

And then:
>you saying OU couldn't have such a licensing structure?

OU could have a licensing structure but AE certainly does not. So when you say that there could be "licensed private prospectors", just bear in mind that you are at least as likely to run into unlicensed prospectors. Or at least people who will claim, under some circumstances, to be prospectors. 

>AE is an umbrella to OU? I sure have missed much.

:-) Nobody can prove that. And no one can prove that the OU is an umbrella to the AE, either.

To be at least slightly serious, I would say that the AE could very well be part of the ORC--if so, the AE ought to go on the Canon Map.



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l