GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 233 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup



>Oh, and, I even call the one-owner per system, or even planet, into
>question. The central thrust of my Four Corners campaign has all of the majors with a presence in a rim system that is low in population and habitability, but high in strategic resources.

Alarish now claims a system, Cibola, with a habitable planet; however, the planet itself is occupied by half a dozen (non-Alarishi) colonies plus a UN station. 

>> >"the OU claims all the useless M type stars"
>> > They *all* get visited by OU patrol vessels
>>
>> Nightvision class fast recon corvettes, often with
>> "Imperial University Astronomical Survey" painted on the side.
>
>Not to mention licensed, private prospectors and their suppliers

"Licensed"? <quick flip through translation program>
In the AE, you can get trained, independently inspected, audited, bonded, but I don't think you can get licensed...You mean you're going to *pay* someone to tell you that you can do something? 
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
  • Next by Date: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
  • Next by thread: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:30 GMT 2006