GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 222 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup



One thing that bugs me slightly - and this is a personal opinion, and what we have is probably far too good to change to correct it.

The relative numbers of colonies for major vs minor powers.

I think that the "Big 2", the ANC and ESU, should have 16, the "Second 2", the FSE and NSL 8, the other canonical minors 4 each, non-canonical minors 2, and break-aways and fledgling powers 1.

Those are ratios, not actual numbers, and YMMV.

For example, I think the OU is too big compared to the ESU, though probably about right compared to the other minors, the IC etc. Though given the large numbers of "M"s it has, maybe it should have an uncharacteristically small number of quality systems compared to others. 3 vs the usual 4 perhaps (and an effective 5-6 when M class systems are taken into consideration)

Anyway, just an opinion, and I certainly don't want the change the world - unless a cmplete re-draw is needed for other reasons.

Zoe
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [FT]Stupid graphic tricks Re:[GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:30 GMT 2006