GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 221 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [FT]Stupid graphic tricks Re:[GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup



laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Oh, quick question: these still exclude class M? Forgive me for not being able to tell just by looking.


Anything not on the map belongs to the AE and/or OU :-)

Exactly.

The main reason for "the OU claims all the useless M type stars" is so that no-one would get sneaky and start making secret naval bases "off map" in out-of-the-way places. They *all* get visited by OU patrol vessels, putting out navigational, SAR and R&D satellites and such like.

A naval base can be constructed, the OU hasn't got the resources to interfere, but it won't be a secret.

And if Side A's Naval Base gets constructed, usually the OU will offer some anti-pirate and security patrols in Side B's hinterland, so side B can come and beat up on it with the forces so released.

The OU can't stop anyone grabbing any of its claimed territory : but they can and do make the costs outweigh the benefits.

But essentially it's a Plot Device to simplify the map, and provide PSB for why the M class stars aren't included.

--
Zoe & Carmen Brain
http://aebrain.blogspot.com
mailto:aebrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC News - Comments and Ideas requested
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

  • Previous by thread: Re: [FT]Stupid graphic tricks Re:[GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [FT]Stupid graphic tricks Re:[GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:30 GMT 2006