GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 152 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Re: Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump



>>> If you can only jump once every 6 hours while the FTL recharges 

Recharging for a tacjump wouldn't take six hours.  I'm pretty sure that my first post said "half a dozen turns" or something to that effect. Does that make it look better?


>Why does this mechanic need changing? If you make it too easy for a fleet to jump out you could just end up with fleets sitting back salvoing MT missiles and then jumping.

So? They can do that anyway.

>> Imagine two opposing paradrops into the same area.
>Deployment would be random and specialised units like carriers and ADFC units end up out of formation.

Not necessarily random, just dispersed.

>There is a reason that paradroping is not used into a warzone often. It's high risk and the casualties are often heavy.

Don't carry the paradrop analogy too far.  In this case *both sides* are dropping in.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump
  • Next by Date: [GZG] FT but off the wall and a little OT]

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:30 GMT 2006