GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 147 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] A Heavy Missile Question







I always think of heavy missile warheads as being bomb-pumped laser that fire from a few hundred km away. If you picture it the same way, then "no."


If on the other hand you picture a missile warhead as being, oh, a sticky bomb or a nano swarm or something else that makes physical contact with the target, then "yes". Pick whatever PSB gives the result you want.


I always thought of MT missiles as a large nuke (50 to 100 MT range, afyer all the ruskies did detonate a 50 mt bomb once and using the layered warhead there is no limit on the size possible). The dammage was due to the effects of the explosion itself (did post a liink once to the effect of a nuclear detonation in space).


Of course, this raises the effect of a MT missile being able to effect more than one target at once, ut it also allows a bomb pumped x-ray laser missilewarhead varient for the MT missile. I would propose some vareint of the MKP packs as used by the KV to represent the armour piercing effect of the lasers (after all, a x-ray laser with the energy of a nuke behind it would definately be counted as having enough energy to go through any armour you care to place).

How about this.
MT missile laser warhead.

When gets within 6MU of target, detonates firing a hegehog pattern of x-ray lasers in the front arc.

Targeted ship rolls a D6. On a 1, the lasers miss. On 2-5, take a K4 hit (including reroll). On a 6, take 2x K4 hits (including rerolls).

Cost=? (no idea).

Somebody care to run average dammage Vs standard MT missiles? I think this would be more powerfull than a normal warhead, but how much would determin the tweeking required. Or we could keep it this powerful, after all, with the old ship design rules, the MT missiles were a lot more deadly than at present (the hull DP`s have increased but the dammage of the MT missile warhead has not increased).

This has raised another idea for the MT missiles. With the nuke warhead, how about allowing dammage to increase the closer to the target the missile is? Say at 4MU, 1D6, and going up by 1D6 per MU closer it is?

BIF


_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Stargrunt II rules questions
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Stargrunt II rules questions

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [very OT] ANZAC day
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] A Heavy Missile Question

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:30 GMT 2006