GZG List archives -- April 2006

Number 69 of 451 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump



I definitely like this. Good rationale for low start speeds across a face-to-face table.

Perhaps a start of game initiative phase to determine setup:
1) Roll dice, reroll ties, loser choses "deployment point" somewhere on the table. Winner chooses second.
2) Roll dice again, winner chooses whether their force is "arriving" or "in place". Loser is the opposite. In case of ties, both sides are "arriving".
3) Roll dice, reroll ties for determinig ship placement. Players alternate placing ships on the board. Ships "in place" stay where they're put. "Arriving" ships have some misjump possibility - half or less than that of standard FTL arrival. Ships that arrive but are displaced off the board are out of play.



Start speed for the game is up to 1xMD for any given ship.



Horrible Gaze'n Apeman (Noam Raphael Izenberg - yes, I'm lookin' at _you_)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
  • Next by Date: Fwd: Flag Decals (was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup)

  • Previous by thread: [FT] Campaign terminology Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Strategic Campaigns?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon May 01 01:07:29 GMT 2006