RE: [GZG] Re: Mines

["Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Seems quite resonable as long as you picked an unknown cometary body.  The
system defenders might get a little suspicious if, say, Halley's Comet
turned up 3 years early.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Foley
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 8:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Mines
> 
> This reminds me of a concept I came up with a while back that 
> I thought was a bit cute (although perhaps a bit 
> implausible).  We were doing a storyline that didn't allow 
> for cloaking fields, so instead of those we came up with a 
> ship concept where the ship would use ECM with minimum 
> emissions while it trailed behind a comet and let its sensor 
> signature get broken up by the comet's tail, perhaps using 
> gentle nudges of thrust with several of the ships on the 
> comet itself so that you didn't have to wait a literally 
> astronomical amount of time to get in-system.  

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l