Re: [GZG] Timescales

["Allan Goodall" <agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/20/06, gzg-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<gzg-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:44:24 +0100
> From: Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxx>

> Yes, but note that this "one or even several minutes" discussion comes
> *before* the "If it is necessary ..." bit. The SG2 timescale section
> discusses the SG2 game turn as being nebulous, but this discussion lands
> with a statement that the turn should - in those cases where it is
> important to know the "real-world" time elapsed - be treated as
> "approximately 5 minutes".

That's why there's debate about it. It's a matter of interpretation,
with regard to a contradictory piece of text. I'm pretty sure Jon has
said on the list that the game turn in SG2 doesn't represent an actual
fixed time period.

Oh, well.

> Ouch. Was it I that drove him away, or were there other reasons? :-(

There were other reasons.

--
Allan Goodall            http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
awgoodall@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l