GZG List archives -- March 2006

Number 237 of 507 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Re: [GZG] DSIII q



>Well, there *could* have been more turns if folks hadn't just jumped into combat. [snip] That said, I find that in many cases recon becomes an activation or two, if it's done at all. ;)

Gonna need some really good hidden movement rules to make recon more important, then.

>> Which reminds me, on Friday night at ECC we had a unit in Company B break, and the morale penalty was applied to the whole force (ie company A and the HQ platoon). Is that the way we should have done it, or should it only have applied to Co B units?

> I'll let OA be definitive on this one, but my guess is that I screwed up. 

I said "we" because I've read the rules too, and I think it may be a phrasing issue.  Don't have a copy with me but IIRC it's something like "when a unit breaks, stress is applied to the other units in the same command", and "same command" got interpreted as "battalion" instead of "company" by you, me, Indy, and anyone else there who'd read the rules. 
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] DSIII q
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] DSIII q

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] DSIII q
  • Next by thread: RE: [GZG] DSIII q

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Fri Mar 31 01:12:49 GMT 2006