[GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 28

[Glenn Wilson <warbeads@xxxxxxxxx>]

I can think of several times that the 'high flying bird' image for cartography was used to confirm an Intelligence issue but you'd have to take my word on it.  But that's still not geosynchronous... and I won't go there about resolution now, much less in the future.

gzg-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

<snip>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:27:57 -0800
From: Tony Christney
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <2546637c0243abd03c32ce68ea1d36e8@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Definitely not talking about geosynchronous satellites. Their orbits
are much too
high to be effective at surveillance, i.e. sub 2 meter photography.

Tony C.

On 8-Mar-06, at 2:19 PM, Glenn Wilson wrote:

> UAVs and satellites fulfill different functions.  Also, are we talking
> geosynchronous (spelling) satellites?
>




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

End of Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 28
*************************************

Gracias,

 

Glenn Wilson

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l