GZG List archives -- March 2006

Number 185 of 507 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] DSIII q



> 
> Yup, except that if he had had elements in either of the the otehr two 
> platoons, he would have been involved.
> 

   Yes, except if it was his elements that became shaken each time.  Now, I 
 know what most people are thinking -- "what are the odds?", but what are the 
 odds that all three elements of a platoon get shaken quickly either?  Any 
 three squads can go to ground at almost any point.  An extensive firefight 
 after that point will leave that player out of it.

   I should probably let this go, but I sort of pay attention to another rule
 set called Picquet that has a similiar problem in convention settings.  
 Eventually several house rule variants to get around it became so prevalent
 that they became effectively back written into the rules as options.  In this
 case, I'd rather the option just be there from the start.

   Of course, it's entirely possible that it is just really really rare.  I'd
 like to see the people trying it out on their own to pay attention to all the
 units and see if long inactive times are common or not.  Consider what would
 have happened if all of those forces were commanded by one person.



   grant
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] DSIII q
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] DSIII q

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] DSIII q
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] DSIII q

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Fri Mar 31 01:12:47 GMT 2006