GZG List archives -- March 2006

Number 147 of 507 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] DSIII q



> 
> Grant,
> 
> I think that your comments are very constructive - especially when they 
> are mapped to "what works in a convention setting?"  I purposely left out 
> most of the artillery (the base defenders had two mortar teams, but they 
> were only good against deployed infantry, and I don't think that the 
> K'hiff ever did deploy them!).
> 
> As to my mistakes with the rules, I must admit the combination of weekly 
> changes and modifications and too little sleep definitely had a negative 
> impact on my ability to keep things straight.  As OA pointed out to me in 
> a seprate mailing, the changes that have been made in the last 6 months 
> actualy contribute to me NOT knowing what I'm doing 'cause I mix up what 
> is with what used to be.
> 
> On that note, I'm gonna try something completely different for ECCX. :)
> 
> J
> 

   No problems John.  Mistakes in beta-testing are probably beneficial!  :-)

   I have to admit that I've very curious as to how the artillery blends into
 firefights.

  grant

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] NAC - American style - new ships
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] FMA skirmish

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] DSIII q
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] DSIII q

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Fri Mar 31 01:12:45 GMT 2006