Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC Majestic/A class

[Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That's what I thought, but, no. The fluff just contrasts the Majestic BC
with the Victoria BB, which has no SM's.

Sorry to be no further help, but when I've got a minute later, I'll try a
search of the list archives.

The_Beast

gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/28/2006 06:59:38 AM:

> Is it not in the fluff paragraph in FB1?
>
> Mk

> On 1/30/06, McCarthy, Tom (xwave) <Tom.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That sounds like a pretty common idea for a Majestic variant, but I
> don't know where it's found.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gzg-l-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gregory Wong
> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 1:15 PM
> > To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [GZG] [FT] NAC Majestic/A class
> >
> > I have in my notes some mention of the NAC Majestic/A class.
> > This variant of the Majectic battlecruiser gets rid of the SMS
> > and adds more beam weaponry.  But I don't have the SDS, nor do
> > I remember where I even found this variant.  Can someone
> > point me to the Majestic/A variant?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --Greg

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l