GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 613 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Full Sail 2.0




TomB wrote on 01/20/2006 10:58:08 AM:

> A minor terminology point for Daryl:
>
> Demasted, although possibly gramatically correct, does not
> seem to be the term I hear
> frequently when reading about age of sail. They seem to
> use the term dismasted. You may
> want to amend your terminology to seem more salty... ;)

Thanks! There was something itching in my consciousness, but I just
couldn't figure what!

> I'm going to review the rules, compare them with Rod
> Langston's Tiller and Whipstaff or
> his Signal Close Action fast play rules and see if any
> additional critiques or suggestions
> arise.

Do you have a link with any info on these? Can't seem to find even
descriptions.

> It's a good effort though. Of course, as a vector player
> who can't fly cinematic to save
> his life, I see my ships ending up on reefs.

Seriously? I thought all the talk about 'realism' was a cover for a
rules-for-babies 'tude; never thought that a vector player could have near
as much trouble with the original as I have with the vector! ;->=

Of course, I've often cranked up a ship only to drop off the 'edge' of
space with my favored ruleset. Definitly NOT being patronizing here!

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Full Sail 2.0
  • Next by thread: [GZG] Re: Full Sail 2.0

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:02 GMT 2006