GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 559 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[GZG] Re: John's Shipbuilding



Indy wrote: 
> Why can't FT be its 'own' Age? Space ain't like the ocean, and scuttling a
> spaceship is tantamount to suicide if done right (ie, total destruction of
> said ship, making it completely useless for the other side to salvage or
> gain valuable intel - or even use the ship against its owners - and any
> escaping crew would likely be unable to avoid the blast of the
> self-destructing ship). If an FT ship surrenders in battle, it's likely to
> save the crew.  At least in WW2, scuttling a ship meant it was near
> impossible for the enemy to retrieve it for any purpose, and the crew would
> likely be rescued by the attacking enemy ship(s). Or at least had a fighting
> chance for survival.

Good point.  While scuttling a ship to deny it to the enemy is a great policy, it seems to me that it would only be common 1) if there's some way to get the crew off the ship with a reasonable expectation of survival, or 2) if they expect that they're all going to be killed if they surrender anyway. 


Scott Field
?Well, my days of not taking you serious are certainly coming to a middle.?
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding
  • Next by Date: RE: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 8, Issue 90
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: John's Shipbuilding

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:02 GMT 2006