GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 526 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT World



Brian B said:
The reason this doesn't necessarily transfer well to FT is simple: 
Space isn't full of water.  From what I remember, the ability of
larger ships to fo faster than smaller ships, at least in the Age of
Sail, had to do with drag and the dynamics of the hull interacting
with the water.

Tomb:
Well, it might. Yes, you are right that it has to do with inertia, hull shape, 
etc. But in the FT world, maybe larger mass FTL drives are inherently more 
efficient. Hence your SDN, even paying the same 10% mass for FTL, still has a
more efficient (from a campaign standpoint) drive. This is one of those economy
of scale factors. Smaller ships can do FTL too, but perhaps they are either 
slower (smaller mass of drive) or else capable of less endurance (lighter mass
drive can't hold the field up as long... insert other goobledigook PSB wherever
you feel necessary). So this effect could be obtained in a campaign, if it was
desirable. Or perhaps, if you wanted to, you split those theories in two: Smaller
ships (lighter fields) can go further in hyper, but larger ships can go faster. 
Or vice versa. So thus you'd create a class of ships that can move quickly in 
FTL and another that can execute longer ranged manouvers in FTL. 



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT World

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT World

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:01 GMT 2006