RE: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world

["Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

With regards to flag bridges, I tried incorporating that into my old
campaign set; using crew quality rules (for admirals as well as ships),
giving an initiative bonus/penalty made the investment for each squadron
worthwhile.  I costs you a B-2 or similar, but well worth +1 initiative.

For campaign movement, I think the best compromise is buying multiple FTL
systems.  Each campaign turn, ships can move X distance times FTL drives.
Or even allow ships with multiple FTL to "hit and run" by moving, fighting
and then getting a strategic FTL move afterwards. 
Gives long range raiders the chance to scout and run away if they stumble
over a major fleet (of course if that fleet has cruisers of their own, they
can still bring the raider to action; at the cost of separating the fleet).
The 10% mass isn't a major cost around the cruiser sized ships (one or two
guns), but you could build a "long range" SDN if you're willing to pay the
tactical cost of all that mass.



Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Barclay
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:35 AM
> Subject: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world
> 
> This brings to mind another aspect of the campaign game which 
> might trickle down into ship
> designs - allocating extra space for things like flag bridges 
> for squadron command or
> allocating additional space for crew comfort and supplies and 
> fuel to allow longer
> cruising operations. These are things which should show up as 
> a few cargo spaces or the
> like on long-distance commerce or penetration raiders, but we 
> don't have any designs that
> look this way right now officially. 
> 
> TomB

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l