GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 484 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding



Urk. Destroyers might not have had the endurance. I'm not awake today. I stand corrected most likely.

E

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Foley" <stiltman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding



The Bismarck's cruising speed was something like 28-32 knots. There were relatively few British ships that were able to keep up with it. The King George V class, battlecruisers, and true cruisers on both sides were able to stay with it, nothing that was able to match up with it very well in a straight fight. The British battlecruisers were always envisioned as cruiser-killers and not things that were intended to stay up against real battleships, except that nobody seemed to ever tell the Admiralty that, and numerous instances in which they suffered catastrophic magazine explosions in such fights from armor that wasn't able to trade hits with battleships at all needed to happen before the Admiralty figured it out for themselves.

So yes, the Prinz Eugen and German destroyers were perfectly capable of staying with the Bismarck.

E

----- Original Message ----- From: <damosan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding




First, the German Navy had a minimal surface combatant force and as a result focused on fast ships intended for independant commerce raiding rather than decisive engagements with the RN's battleline. Second, the decision to ditch the escorts early on, which baffles me.


Your first statement answers the second I think. The Bismark was built as a fast commerce raider wasn't it? Did German escort vessels have the range/endurance to keep up with B. while out at sea for any length of time?


--
Damo
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [DS] Anti-tankette actions was [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 8, Issue 57 and Re: [GZG] Re: FT Scenarios
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Ship point values and effectiveness

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:00 GMT 2006