GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 476 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding



> 
> First, the German Navy had a minimal surface combatant force and as a
> result focused on fast ships intended for independant commerce raiding
> rather than decisive engagements with the RN's battleline.  Second,
> the decision to ditch the escorts early on, which baffles me.
> 

Your first statement answers the second I think.  The Bismark was built as a fast commerce raider wasn't it?  Did German escort vessels have the range/endurance to keep up with B. while out at sea for any length of time?

--
Damo
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:00 GMT 2006