GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 389 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: RE: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)



> 
> From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2006/01/13 Fri AM 10:37:03 GMT+13:00
> To: <gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: RE: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)
> 
> St Jon said:
> > So should the mission cards carry deployment guides as well, or is
> > that too restricting? Should that be left up to the player (apart
> > from any scenario-specific stuff such as deployment of convoys,
> fixed
> > installations etc)?
> 
> Have that be a separate set of cards:
> "Deploy 1/4 way down the table, facing away from the table center"
> "Deploy in two groups, at with at least 1/3 your NPV and at least 30
> mu apart"
> "Deploy from jump"
> etc

I'm not sure I like to be told how to deploy my forces. I'd like to have the strategic options of how to do the mission.

As has aready been said, any scenario restrictions that take away your ability as the player to make what you consider to be the best decisions reduce your enjoyment.

John

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: RE: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)
  • Next by Date: [GZG] [FT] Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)

  • Previous by thread: RE: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)
  • Next by thread: Re: RE: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:00 GMT 2006