GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 371 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [GZG] RE: FT Scenarios



I’ve taken more than a casual look at Victory By Any Means.  It’s a campaign game with politics, espionage, trade, economics, manufacturing and combat.  They have guidelines for when a battle is not worth resolving (too one-sided), when it should be resolved as fleet combat (abstract), and when it should go to the table.

 

I’ve considered using JUMP (Justified Use of Military Power) in a similar way, but the game mechanics of JUMP don’t line up well with FT.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)
  • Next by Date: RE: FT Scenarios (was: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems)

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] RE: FT Scenarios
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] RE: FT Scenarios

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:08:00 GMT 2006