GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 299 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems



Mike Sarno said: 
> [All the VP with the Crown Price]
> is a good scenario. If a player chose to work the
> proposed VP  system like that EVERY time, that would be a
> more than just a bit excessive.

Concur with both parts of that. 
 
> The current default scenario, kill more CPV than you lose,
> is subject to  more cheese-ification than the proposed
> system. I seem to remember a  certain Can-Am game at ECC
> where the US team brought nothing but carriers.

That problem was "massed fighters are unbalanced" (plus some
other factors), not due to the concept of "kill more CPV". 

How about "assign VP to the ENEMY's ships" rather than your
own?  With a limit of +/- 100% of its normal CPV.  Example:
if your enemy has 3 cruisers at 200PV each, any one of them
could be worth 0-400PV as long as the total is still 600.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] [FT] New NAC ships profiles and fighters
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Little Big horn was: Points systems

  • Previous by thread: RE: [GZG] Re: Points systems
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:07:59 GMT 2006