GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 157 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....



> I'm starting to really, really wonder if having two separate
> design systems, or, at least, two separate cost systems is the only
> way to achieve true balance.  (i.e. a Kra'Vak ship is worth X points
> in Cinematic, but Y points in Vector.)

This works to a point.  I played Silent Death heavily, and they
recognized that the rules governing how torpedoes moved greatly affected
the value of torpedo-laden ships.  The problem was, as options for
torpedo rules proliferated and multiplied, the table of costs for
various ship designs got very cumbersome (Standard, Variable Speed,
Homing, Variable Speed Homing, Tough, Tough Variable Speed, Tough
Homing, Tough Variable Speed Homing, Unjammable, Unjammable Variable
Speed, ...).



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:07:58 GMT 2006