GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 144 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....



What about a different point system for each movement system,
specifically targeting the value of multi-arc weapons systems, which
seem far less worthwhile in Vector (or at least Vector as the rules
now stand)?

On 1/6/06, Noam Izenberg <noam.izenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > The point of this discussion is how Jon should change the vector rules
> > such that ships designed for Cinematic will also be viable in Vector.
>
> Problem is, that's not really possible- if what you're looking for in
> Vector is a more "realistic" movement system. If you restrict
> rotations in vector to retain the viability of multiple arc weapons,
> you're trading realism. You have the increased realism of (more)
> newtonian motion, but a decreased realism in how ships can rotate in
> free space.
>
>
> ---
>
> "Ah! You seen one Earth, you've seen them all."
>    - Jack Schmitt on the moon, Apollo 17, 118:08:10
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:07:58 GMT 2006