GZG List archives -- January 2006

Number 136 of 673 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....



Laserlight wrote:
The point of this discussion is how Jon should change the vector rules
such that ships designed for Cinematic will also be viable in Vector.
We do NOT want a stable of Cinematic designs and a separate stable of
Vector designs.

But here's the $64 question -- can there be designed a set of ships (or more importantly, a design system for ships) that is balanced for Cinenmatic movement, Vector movement, and interesting enough that people can generate the flavour they want?

I'm not sure it's possible, not without requiring people to use
some common sense and try to refrain from going all Munchkin.  And
I'm aware the 'these rules need common sense, we're aware there are
loopholes' setup isn't a popular viewpoint these days.  (8-)

JGH
--
Jerry Han - jhan@xxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.warpfish.com/jhan - TBFTGOGGI
"The snow is coming down, on our New England town, and it's been falling
all day long; what else is new? What can I do? But sing this Valley
Winter Song, I wrote for you" -- Fountains of Wayne,"Valley Winter Song"
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] [FT] New NAC ships profiles and fighters
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
  • Next by thread: RE: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Feb 01 02:07:58 GMT 2006