Re: [GZG] [Stargrunt]

[Roger Books <roger.books@xxxxxxxxx>]

So is there any hope for an SG3 with a better morale system?

Roger

On 1/4/06, Allan Goodall <agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 1/4/06, gzg-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<gzg-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:46:32 -0600
> From: "David Rodemaker" <dar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [GZG] [Stargrunt]

> I've played it with anything from fire-teams to company sized engagements, a
> couple of platoons on each side seems to work best.

Unfortunately, as Beth has pointed out in the past, the SG2 Confidence
Test system works best with only 1 platoon per side. Otherwise it's
not nasty enough.

Two platoons per side works best, but this is kind of an odd size:
bigger than a platoon, but not a full company. It's probably my
biggest (of several) complaints I have about SG2.

--
Allan Goodall             http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
awgoodall@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l