GZG List archives -- December 2005

Number 193 of 222 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] conversion questions



so, it seems that opinion is that even a pulsar 'stuck' in one mode but still allowed its PDS ability is a MASSX5 weapon, or MASSX4?
 
Also, so the weaponms your referring to as well John (NIFT I assume?) but I wanted to keep any conversions I do as close to 'canon' FT as I could :)  Even though such a thing is a bit of a loose definition in and of itself!

gzg-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:58:20 +0100
From: Oerjan Ariander
Subject: Re: [GZG] conversion questions
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.1.20051229002447.031b9670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

jason standlea wrote:

>how much points would the various Pulsar's be (c/m/! l) if you were making a
>weapon with the profile of just one of the modes, that cannot switch to
>other modes ever?
>
>How much more would it be in your guys opinion if said weapon(s) kept the
>PDS shot ability?

Um. I'm not entirely sure what you mean with "mode" here.

The Pulser PDS ability is an integral part of the "profile" of *each* of
the different configurations (C, M and L), so if all you do is forbid the
weapon from being reconfigured it will retain the PDS ability and its
points cost won't change at all (because the points cost only measures the
weapon's value *during* tactical battles, and Pulsers can only be
reconfigured *between* battles).

If you remove the PDS ability, the Pulser cost drops to 4x Mass (regardless
of whether or not it can be reconfigured between battles).

I hope this helps...

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxx

"Life is like a sewer.
What! you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:40:51 +1300
From: John Tailby
Subject: Re: Re: [GZG] conversion questions
To:
Message-ID:
<20051229024051.UJE1416.mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz@[202.27.184.228]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


>
> From: Oerjan Ariander
> Date: 2005/12/29 Thu PM 12:58:20 GMT+13:00
> To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [GZG] conversion questions
>
> jason standlea wrote:
>
> >how much points would the various Pulsar's be (c/m/l) if you were making a
> >weapon with the profile of just one of the modes, that cannot switch to
> >other modes ever?

I've found weapon systems that duplicate the effects you have described.

The Gat! ling blaster is 12" range and6 beam dice or 1 PDS shot. Its mass times 4

The Twin Particle Array duplicates the pulsar in M mode and again its mass times 4.

They get quite expensive but I have seen mass 50 cruisers mounting 5 multi arc arrays ans can dish out a fair number of dice at 24 inches.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

End of Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 31
************************************


Yahoo! Photos
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Photos of 25mm scandinavians
  • Next by Date: RE: [GZG] Re: Re: [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] conversion questions
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] conversion questions

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sun Jan 01 02:07:36 GMT 2006