GZG List archives -- December 2005

Number 166 of 222 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak



> A current example: The orientation thruters on the Space Shuttle are
> smaller that either the main engines or the orbital manuevering engines.

Sorry that a cinematic devotee pipes in, but the example is pretty much
moot in my estimation. I realize that some rationalizations have it that
the rotational time is insignificant in the turn, but I always thought the
numbers used were pretty arbitrary.

In fact, since vector has a ship's 'final' orientation in each turn, I
would put it to you that the rotational time IS significant, and therefore,
the 'lost' movement points have nothing to do with the size of any of your
thrusters, but the lessened slice of time devoted to your main thrusters
pointed in one direction.

However, it is silly, and I will have nothing to do with it.

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sun Jan 01 02:07:36 GMT 2006