GZG List archives -- November 2005

Number 329 of 329 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [GZG] When placing Modular Fighters on carriers



Hanger bays are already considered to have a suitable selection of stores
and weapon pods included in the mass required.  Of the 1.5 mass per fighter
of hanger space only 0.6-1.0 of the mass is the fighter and loading
equipment; the rest is launch/recovery/rearming/repair and other support
equipment.  There is a lot of empty space in a hanger.

If you want to specifically require extra storage for Omni-pods, let them
have 2 configurations available as part of the basic hanger and require 1
mass of cargo per squadron for each additional configuration.
ie.  A Mass 9 hanger + 1 cargo would have 6 fighters and carry the Prime, A
& B configuration equipment.

If you're converting for Battletech/Battlespace, remember that Battlespace
uses a 10-fighter squadron as standard (so Mass 15 hangers).


Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies


-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of DOCAgren@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:20 PM
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GZG] When placing Modular Fighters on carriers

Now should a force equiped with Omni-Fighters, still be able to place 6
fighters in a Mass 9 Hanger bay, and having the ability to retrofit pods per
current needs, or should the carrier need to alot Cargo space to have extra
"pods available"?

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] OT: 25 MM Vehicle Size Comparisons

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] When placing Modular Fighters on carriers
  • Next by thread: [GZG][OFFICIAL] GERMY'S MICRO-MINIS NOW READY!!

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Dec 22 13:19:20 GMT 2005